All rights records

Is Teenage Cave Man (1958) public domain?

It is on every public domain list on the internet. The copyright record says otherwise, and here is the number.

Not public domain in the United States

What is usually said

A Roger Corman picture that circulates freely and appears on the usual lists, often under the assumption that anything this cheap was never renewed.

The finding, and the working behind it

Not public domain: renewed as RE0000286138 on 12 February 1986, in copyright to the end of 2053.

Renewed on 12 February 1986 by Selma Enterprises, naming the original registration LP0000012027 and an original entry under Malibu Productions.

The catalog entry is the reason nobody finds it. The film is remembered as a Corman picture for American International; the record says Malibu Productions, and the renewal says Selma Enterprises. Neither name is on the poster, and a search for either of the ones that are returns nothing.

Second of the three Selma renewals, between I Was a Teenage Werewolf in October 1985 and The Brain Eaters in April 1986.

The register, as it stands

Renewal
RE0000286138, registered 12 February 1986
Renewal claimant
Selma Enterprises, as proprietor of a work made for hire
Filed under the title
Teenage cave man; motion picture. By Malibu Productions
Original registration
LP0000012027
US copyright runs to
the end of 2053
Searched
2026-09-07

The one thing that can be said against this

As with the rest of this group, the renewal was filed by a party with no obvious connection to the original production. That is a question about ownership, not about existence: the registration is on the public record either way.

How to check this yourself

Everything above is drawn from public records. None of it requires our word:

Where these numbers came from

What this does and does not mean

This is a finding about United States copyright, made in good faith from the public record. Copyright terms differ by country, and a film in the public domain here may still be protected elsewhere.

A renewal registration on the public record is evidence that a copyright was claimed, not a judgment that the claim is good. Who holds it, and whether the chain of title behind it stands up, are separate questions we are not in a position to answer. What we can say is that the record is not empty, and every list describing this film as free is asserting that it is.

This is a record of research and not legal advice. If you hold a right in this film, or you think we have read the record wrong, write to mike@tapeterritory.com with what we missed and we will correct it here.

What we do about it

We do not publish this film and we do not link to a copy of it. It is on our blocked list by name rather than by upload, because the same title reappears under a dozen identifiers and blocking identifiers would be an endless game.

Writing this down costs us a film people search for, which is rather the point. Everything else in this section is a film we did clear, researched the same way by the same person, and a record that only ever says yes would not be worth reading.

Why we did this research

Establishing what may be published is the first step before restoring a film and writing an audio description for it. That is what this site is for, and we do the same work on commission — audio description and captioning, with published rates.